Part of Thermo Fisher Scientific
CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE SELECTIVE AGAR (CCFA)
for the isolation and presumptive identification of Clostridium difficile from clinical specimens
Products available | size/format | order code |
Clostridium difficile Selective agar (UK) | 10 x 90mm plates | PB0218A |
Clostridium difficile Selective agar (rest of Europe) | 10 x 90mm plates | PB5054A |
Typical Formula * | gm/litre |
Proteose peptone | 40.0 |
Disodium hydrogen phosphate | 5.0 |
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate | 1.0 |
Magnesium sulphate | 0.1 |
Sodium chloride | 2.0 |
Fructose | 6.0 |
Agar | 15.0 |
D-cycloserine | 0.250 |
Cefoxitin | 0.008 |
Defibrinated horse blood | 70ml |
pH 7.4 ± 0.2 @ 25°C |
Description
Clostridium difficile was first isolated in 1935 by Hall and O’Toole1 who proposed the name `difficile’ because it was very difficult to isolate. In 1940 Snyder2 isolated Clostridium difficile from infants aged 10 weeks to 1 year. No further isolations were reported until 1960, when the organism was cultured by McBee3 from the intestinal contents of a seal, and in 1962 Smith and King4 reported its presence in human infections.
Toxicogenic isolates of Clostridium. difficile have been demonstrated to be a major cause of antibiotic-associated ileo-caecitis in laboratory animals5 and pseudomembranous colitis in man6,7. Keighley8 found Clostridium difficile was associated with colitis and diarrhoea without pseudomembranous changes after antibiotic therapy following gastrointestinal operations.
Hafiz and Oakley9 devised a medium for the selective isolation of Clostridium difficile based on the observation that the organism has a high tolerance to cresol, which it produces during its growth, and used Reinforced Clostridial Medium (CM0151) plus 0.2% phenol or p-cresol.
George et al.10 in a study of selective media for the routine isolation of Clostridium difficile from faecal specimens found this medium was inhibitory compared with growth on blood agar. They recommended the use of a fructose containing nutrient medium plus egg yolk, with D-cycloserine and cefoxitin as selective agents for the isolation of Clostridium difficile.
This medium based on the formulation proposed by George et al.10. The selective agents D-cycloserine (500µg/ml) and cefoxitin (16µg/ml) inhibit growth of the majority of Enterobacteriaceae, as well as Streptococcus faecalis, staphylococci, Gram-negative non-sporing anaerobic bacilli and Clostridia spp. (except Clostridium difficile) which may be found in large numbers in faecal samples.
Levett11, noting reports12,13 that some strains of Clostridium difficile had low minimum inhibitory concentrations to both cycloserine and cefoxitin, reduced the antibiotic concentrations to 125µg/ml cycloserine and 4µg/ml cefoxitin and combined this with alcohol shock14 to compensate for the reduction in selectivity. Clostridium difficile was isolated from all of the 33 faecal specimens plated on to CCFA Medium containing cycloserine and cefoxitin at 250µg/ml and 8µg/ml respectively, but from only 25 of 33 specimens plated on to medium containing 500µg/ml cycloserine and 16µg/ml cefoxitin. The specimen should be treated with alcohol before inoculation (see technique).
It can be expected that medium containing the lower concentration of antibiotics will yield a greater growth of contaminating organisms if antibiotics are used alone, but Levett reported that there was no difference in the growth of contaminating organisms on plates containing either concentration of antibiotics following alcohol shock treatment of the specimen.
Phillips and Rogers15 have described a simple modification to the medium in which the ability of Clostridium difficile to produce p-cresol from p-hydroxyphenyl acetic acid is used for the rapid presumptive identification by gas chromatographic detection of the p-cresol.
Addition of 7% horse blood to the agar base increases the recovery of Clostridium difficile and produces larger colonies compared with Egg Yolk Emulsion used by George et al.10.
Technique
Technique for Alcohol Shock Treatment
Storage conditions and Shelf life
Appearance
Ruby red agar
Quality control
Positive control: | Expected results |
Clostridium difficile NCTC 11204 | Good growth; grey-white coloured colonies |
Negative controls: | |
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC® 25923* | No growth |
Escherichia coli ATCC® 25922* | No growth |
* This organism is available as a Culti-Loop®
Precautions
Oxoid Clostridium difficile Selective agar (CCFA) is for in vitro diagnostic use only, by experienced microbiologists. It must not be used beyond the stated expiry date, or if the product shows any sign of deterioration.
Typical Gram stain morphology of Clostridium difficile may not be evident in colonies picked from this medium because of the antibiotics present. Subculture to blood agar to obtain characteristic morphology10.
References
1. Hall I. and O’Toole E. (1935) Am. J. Dis. Child. 49. 390.
2. Snyder M. L. (1940) J. Infect. Dis. 66. 1.
3. McBee R. H. (1960) J. Bact. 79. 311.
4. Smith L. D. S. and King E. O. (1962) J. Bact. 84. 65.
5. Bartlett J. G., Onderdonk A. B., Cisneros R. L. and Kasper D. L. (1977) J. Infect. Dis. 136. 701-705.
6. Bartlett J. G., Chang T. W., Gurwith M., Gorbach S. L. and Onderdonk A. B. (1978) N. Engl. J. Med. 298. 531-534.
7. George W. L., Sutter V. L., Goldstein E. C. J., Ludwig S. L. and Finegold S. M. (1978) Lancet. i. 802-803.
8. Keighley M. R. B., Burdon D. W., Alexander Williams J. et al (1978) Lancet ii. 1165-1167.
9. Hafiz S. and Oakley C. L. (1976) J. Med. Microbiol. 9. 129-136.
10. George W. L., Sutter V. L., Citron D. and Finegold S. M. (1979) J. Clin. Microbiol. 9. 214-219.
11. Levett (1985) J. Clin. Pathol. 38. 233-234.
12. George W. L., Kirby B. D., Sutter V. L. and Finegold S. M. in Schlessinger D. Editor Microbiology 1979 Washington D.C. American Society for Microbiology, 2670271.
13. Dzink J. and Bartlett J. G. (1980) Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 17. 695-698.
14. Borriello S. P. and Honour H. (1981) J. Clin. Pathol. 34. 1124-1127.
15. Philips K. D. and Rogers P. A. (1981) J. Clin. Pathol. 34. 643-644.